A campaign brief goes in. Virlia searches, watches every candidate video frame by frame, scores brand fit and safety against your own rules, and hands back a ranked shortlist with the evidence attached. This page is the long version.




Same brief, same brand, same run. The pharmacist won on brand fit because of how she explains actives on camera. No tool that sorts by follower count or engagement rate can produce that ordering, which is the entire reason this exists.
TikTok · 21,300 followers
YouTube · 3,570,000 followers
Both creators were watched frame by frame before either was scored.


Studio, two board certified dermatologists


Sofa, bare face, clip on microphone
A metadata tool sees two skincare channels in the same category with similar engagement rates. Virlia sees a scripted studio production and a bare face on a sofa, and knows which one your brief asked for.
| Step | Today | Virlia |
|---|---|---|
| Discovery | Hours scrolling, sorted by follower count | Search angles written the way creators title videos |
| Vetting | Open twenty tabs, skim, form a hunch | Every video watched frame by frame, same criteria |
| Brand safety | Keyword blocklist, or nothing at all | Context judged per video, with the reason attached |
| Outreach | Mail merge that reads like a mail merge | Cites a specific moment the engine actually saw |
| Evidence | A spreadsheet of handles | Every score linked to the frame it came from |